You may think that we gave up and not “producing” anymore, but we haven’t. We are still at it, but we are not under this “productive” insanity pressure most others live with. If there is nothing interesting to report we will not waste your time. When we try various distributions that we either disliked or found nothing of interest, just another tried recipe with a twist of personalization, we just scrap the installation and move on. Then one day a couple of weeks ago we took on PCLinuxOS. If that says something, we are still at it, on a HD installation.
Debian 10 Buster became stable a few months ago, the rest of the systems had to follow but took their time. This is done every two years and creates a wave of confusion, especially those on forked versions of Debian, like antiX, MX, devuan, refracta, etc. Even more dangerous and confusing it is if you are using testing and although testing during debian stretch was buster it now becomes bullseye, while your antiX/MX/Devuan is testing alongside Buster still.
After antiX announced 19 (Marielle Franco) as its current stable branch, MS followed its mothership the week later (a few days ago), while Devuan/Refracta are still chasing Stretch (Debian 9), what they call Devuan 2 or ascii.
So here it is, to take the confusion away from numbers and names:
Debian * Debian * AntiX/MX * Devuan the last good1 * 7 Wheezy * 13 * 0 beta-testing old old stable * 8 Jessie * 15 * 1 jessie (old-stable) old stable * 9 Stretch * 17 * 2 ascii (stable) stable * 10 Buster * 19 * 3 beowulf(testing) testing * 11 Bullseye * 21 * 4 chimaera (next testing) unstable * sid * sid * ceres
There are several new things about Obarun that make the last batch of isos seem like they came from a different distribution. But it has been emphasized by its founder that Obarun is not a distribution but a modification of an arch-linux installation. I don’t for how long would this description be accurate, Obarun now looks like its on its way of become a complete and independent distribution, still based on Arch-Linux. Continue reading
For those who have never heard the name of the distribution and have not researched the late and current differences of init systems and service management and supervision, this may be a shock and major news. For those who have really done their research, they have gone beyond the pop-ular polarization and fallacy of “systemd vs sysvinit” , there is nothing new here to read … Continue reading
You may ask what we are doing with ArchLabs when there is a tremendous amount of original non-systemd based distros on the list (our own lists for example). “Originally a minimalist, Arch-based live distribution with Openbox, the latest release of ArchLabs Linux is a radical departure from the original concept as the distribution is now designed for users who like to customise their system during installation. ” It may be coincidental but the installer is following a bit on the Obarun fashion where you install what you need and like and not what the distribution has chosen. Continue reading
Obarun is now portrayed in Distrowatch
Obarun seems to have started back in the summer of 2015, so it is nearing three years of age, but few people know about it. The name came from a combination of Openbox Arch and Runit, its initial init system. Although the live image’s window manager has changed to JWM due to size, the init system soon after Obarun’s inception changed to S6. Continue reading