We had dedicated much energy in the past, 2 years ago, to advocate for Palemoon and you should at least read the piece about the NoScript parody, and how we gave up on it for specific suspicious reasons (still holds unchanged, Palemoon has branded NoScript as “dangerous” because it breaks pages). We had seeked refuge at Waterfox, retaining some old firefox functionality and ensuring us it is blocking all of Mozilla tactics of robbing you of private data and feeding it to “who knows who”.
Waterfox officially was sold by mr Alex Kontos to System1, a UK payperclick ad company, which it would be absurd to believe that it wouldn’t utilize the browser’s ability to feed their other interests with private data. Or why else would they buy to promote their own browser, to make all others break while they are getting robbed?
Thank you Alex for your sincere efforts and sleepless nights of coding, all these years, it has been a great ride, and it is too bad it had to crash in such a bad time for browser variety and period. Goodbye and good luck for all that you had done up to now.
Having a place as neutral ground to discuss openly and rationally what the obstacles are in giving linux users back the liberty that has abruptly been taken away (by systemd/RedHat/Debian/gnome/pulse/freedesktop), we thought would be a good first step. The reason is that we who were involved in creating such a neutral ground, without hierarchical domination and exclusion, believed that too many parallel efforts are fighting too many common obstacles, prioritizing differently and based on weak data, what the most important obstacles are. Definitely some concentrate on the rhetoric of what this means and not the content of running systemd free. Is it realistic though to expect representatives, ambassadors, leaders of projects in a forum such as nosystemd.icyboards.net to participate and discuss what the problem is and how are we going to formulate a mutual strategy to attack? Continue reading
This place, unlike “most” others is a place by users and for users. It is not any distro’s puppet, nor is it any developer’s medium to market or propagandize for and against others.
Linux forums and lists are functional and self-serving for users (individuals) and developers (teams) as long as they each hold their positions in hierarchy. Continue reading
First things first. Those of us involved in this project had an internal debate from day one whether to cover Devuan development or not. All but one person here, yours truly, argued that Devuan would never be able to overcome and change the psychopathology evident in Debian developer community and the inherent elitism against the common individual user. If you are not directing the departmental budget of an IT enterprise nobody in that community would give a rat’s penny of what your problem may be. Seeking help as a common user you must put up with tons of unsubstantiated arrogance, irony, and elitism. This is also evident in the DNG list where devuan developers and their pre-split backroom buddies are larking, pretending they are Devian without the infrastructure of Debian. It is like a life-raft’s officers and buddies pretending to be the officers operating a supertanker. Continue reading
Out of a discussion on one of the the two linux distributions we follow, there was an inquiry by a new user of what is the long term philosophy and goal of the distribution. One developer was quick to respond individually, not representing the team, that there is no such thing as a “common” philosophy. Continue reading