VD, HIV, STD, Zstd
The deeper issue here is “what is the relationship of Arch-Linux and Orwell?”
Two of the most common intrusive sites reported by linux users that are placed on top of the list of a firewall, so nothing goes in and out between their machine and those sites’ servers, are Google and Facebook. Google on the one hand, in order to play nice against the free/open software community, has been contributing resources, information, and free/open software to improve their image. MS purchased github, IBM purchased RedHat, or should we say they made their relationship more formal. Some developers have fallen for it. Facebook on the other hand is notorious of flooding the machines of their innocent and unsuspecting users with questionable code. Facebook not only knows who you really are, what you really like, what you think and what you are interested in, in the vast majority of cases they know in real time your exact location and may even have the capability of keeping track of your moves. Simply if you have an account on facebook and accessed it once through your “smart” phone, they know. If you access facebook from your desktop, but on smart phone you only use your google account, they know. They, they, who is they? If you are really asking we can go on comments for as far as you can take it. Continue reading
Debian 10 Buster became stable a few months ago, the rest of the systems had to follow but took their time. This is done every two years and creates a wave of confusion, especially those on forked versions of Debian, like antiX, MX, devuan, refracta, etc. Even more dangerous and confusing it is if you are using testing and although testing during debian stretch was buster it now becomes bullseye, while your antiX/MX/Devuan is testing alongside Buster still.
After antiX announced 19 (Marielle Franco) as its current stable branch, MS followed its mothership the week later (a few days ago), while Devuan/Refracta are still chasing Stretch (Debian 9), what they call Devuan 2 or ascii.
So here it is, to take the confusion away from numbers and names:
Debian * Debian * AntiX/MX * Devuan
the last good1 * 7 Wheezy * 13 * 0 beta-testing
old old stable * 8 Jessie * 15 * 1 jessie (old-stable)
old stable * 9 Stretch * 17 * 2 ascii (stable)
stable * 10 Buster * 19 * 3 beowulf(testing)
testing * 11 Bullseye * 21 * 4 chimaera (next testing)
unstable * sid * sid * ceres
It is hard to tell from their web-site, at least if you don’t speak German and rely on the English text, that Knopper, founder or Knoppix, has made an effort from some time to provide freedom in init systems, After getting sysvinit to work (once again on a debian based distribution) this latest version 8.6 not only does it ship without systemd and associates, it contains a conflict pkg that prevents systemd from reinstalling. The package is called “no-systemd”. We welcome Knoppix to the wide non-systemd community and we wish it endless popularity.
The pkg lists of comparing the last two editions 8.2 and 8.6 (and a mysterious 8.4), reveal the effort. 8.6 pkg list 8.2 pkg list
AntiX has a package called systemd-must-die which is very similar 🙂
Since it is all debian based you can seek and install both and compare.
Other than our complete list of distributions without systemd we run a search on Distrowatch for all “linux” distributions without systemd and we came up with a list of 78. Sorry to BSD fans, we have nothing against BSDs we just can’t cover it all and we restrict our focus on linux systems. There were cases in the past where information is not as accurate or up to date on distrowatch so beware of its results (as of 10/14/2018). Continue reading
Is this blog about Open Free software without the plague of systemd, or is it about politics? Let us see, do we want a public forum without politics? Other than specific political communities, what does it really mean to communicate in public but stripped of the right to political expression?
For those who have never heard the name of the distribution and have not researched the late and current differences of init systems and service management and supervision, this may be a shock and major news. For those who have really done their research, they have gone beyond the pop-ular polarization and fallacy of “systemd vs sysvinit” , there is nothing new here to read … Continue reading
First I would like to welcome cynwulf1 to the community and in specific to the small sub-sector of the community of contributors. Cynwulf1 appears to have been around this sport long and with a wide spectrum of experience. He recently contributed an article and some comments on the world of BSDism.
While recently I have worked closer with some of the creators of systems we use I have tried to learn how they think, or how they think differently from us users of systems. The question that appeared to me is whether they can possibly know or care what “people need” or are they just driven by what they need for themselves, which in some cases is a system to work on, while creating systems.