Trident project released a beta image following their alpha releases in the past two months.
For those who missed this developing transition, of Trident leaving its TrueOS/FreeBSD base and moving to linux using Void as its base, here is a summary of what you are missing. It has been a common story for a distribution being fed-up with linux development, developers being consumed to modify their software around systemd-functionality, and have moved to some form of a BSD-unix base. As far as we know there hasn’t been an effort to leave BSD to come to linux. So Trident is drawing its own path making it now a 2 way street. Here are a couple of juicy quotes of their late announcements:
…Currently, Project Trident is based on FreeBSD and uses the TrueOS build framework. Over the years, we have accumulated multiple long-standing issues with the underlying FreeBSD OS. Issues with hardware compatibility, communications standards, or package availability continue to limit Project Trident users…..
Is reddit’s r/linux just a front of IBM’s marketing agents? Under what remote logic would an announcement for a 5 year old distribution be removed and how could it possibly violate r/linux strict code of ethics?
Obarun: New for December …. upgraded yes, new not at all.
Sorry, this post has been removed by the moderators of r/linux.
Moderators remove posts from feeds for a variety of reasons, including keeping communities safe, civil, and true to their purpose
Those are the same tactics utilized across news-sites that appear to be “objectively” promoting linux in general, forums of systemd-only distributions, social media rooms and pages. The idea is to portray linux to new users inquiring about linux while on MSwindows, MACos, Android etc. as a systemd related operating system ONLY. Continue reading
1st some history/background:
Back some time ago an alternative to sysvinit was developed called daemontools (look at sources below) and people liked it. From “it” runit was cloned, very similar but started from scratch, to be as small, as light, as simple, and as responsive as hw itself. Runit set some goals for its development, kept being refined and eliminating any bugs, it worked on as many architectures as people could get their hands on, and the chief runit man decided to put it to bed. Runit has been frozen in time by its developer. Don’t expect it to catch up with other system development unless Void decides to clone it and develop it on their own, which in some ways they already do, but it is more polishing up the existing runit.
What distrowatch calls Debuan 2.1 in its weekly is also listed as a “fixed” release. Since when is anything based on Debian perceived as fixed unless it intentionally had its package management software released. Alternatively any live “image” is fixed unless you update its software. Should someone clarify what such terms mean to Distrowatch?
See, we can even defend the honor of those we openly have disliked in the past.
Devuan’s, not debuan’s, repositories for its 2.xx series based on Debian Stretch, is Ascii.
Next edition which is called Beowulf is still under testing, pkgs for which can be found on
http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/devuan/dists/beowulf/ Continue reading
Debian 10 Buster became stable a few months ago, the rest of the systems had to follow but took their time. This is done every two years and creates a wave of confusion, especially those on forked versions of Debian, like antiX, MX, devuan, refracta, etc. Even more dangerous and confusing it is if you are using testing and although testing during debian stretch was buster it now becomes bullseye, while your antiX/MX/Devuan is testing alongside Buster still.
After antiX announced 19 (Marielle Franco) as its current stable branch, MS followed its mothership the week later (a few days ago), while Devuan/Refracta are still chasing Stretch (Debian 9), what they call Devuan 2 or ascii.
So here it is, to take the confusion away from numbers and names:
Debian * Debian * AntiX/MX * Devuan
the last good1 * 7 Wheezy * 13 * 0 beta-testing
old old stable * 8 Jessie * 15 * 1 jessie (old-stable)
old stable * 9 Stretch * 17 * 2 ascii (stable)
stable * 10 Buster * 19 * 3 beowulf(testing)
testing * 11 Bullseye * 21 * 4 chimaera (next testing)
unstable * sid * sid * ceres
Marielle Franco antiX 19
Rarely a good deed goes unpunished, especially when someone is trying to do something good for the benefit of the many, the weak, the poor, those who are lacking power, against all odds, the rich and powerful of every society. The story of Marielle Franco is a reminder to those who forget in whose world we live in and what it takes to change it.
So antiX 19 is code-named after the late Marielle Franco who dared to turn against wealth and power.
antiX-19 is based on Debian Buster and is as systemd-free as it has always been. As usual it offers the following systemd-free flavours for both 32 and 64 bit architectures: Continue reading
It is hard to tell from their web-site, at least if you don’t speak German and rely on the English text, that Knopper, founder or Knoppix, has made an effort from some time to provide freedom in init systems, After getting sysvinit to work (once again on a debian based distribution) this latest version 8.6 not only does it ship without systemd and associates, it contains a conflict pkg that prevents systemd from reinstalling. The package is called “no-systemd”. We welcome Knoppix to the wide non-systemd community and we wish it endless popularity.
The pkg lists of comparing the last two editions 8.2 and 8.6 (and a mysterious 8.4), reveal the effort. 8.6 pkg list 8.2 pkg list
AntiX has a package called systemd-must-die which is very similar 🙂
Since it is all debian based you can seek and install both and compare.