An interesting post by a person nicknamed as cynwulf posted this comment which I may disagree in a few tiny remarks, agree over all, and want to clarify what is generally perceived as political and what I consider to be political.
First it is better to read what Cynwulf had to say on the issue of security:
Re: pkgmaster is repository hell
Cynwulf, I don’t disagree with much of what you say, but there has been evidence on systemd being a little more than just not “as functional as it claims”, or becoming a monolith mediator between linux and all other software. It is about security. And that becomes automatically political, whether it relates to user and big corporations or the user and the state.
If it’s about security, then don’t use it. If you don’t trust the software or the developers, you look elsewhere, it’s that simple (and no security is not “automatically political”).
NSA or whoever, don’t need crap like systemd, they have backdoors in all major OS, there are exploits, hidden for decades in common software and even in the silicon itself. A specific backdoor in a specific “init system” (thingie) for a specific OS and only a subset of distributions at that, is not that useful.
One could say that systemd is “just business”…. makes a lot more sense than the alternative conspiracy shit. And that’s my take on systemd, always has been – it’s a business move for Red Hat Inc.
When you have the likes of Intel and AMD building in the IME/PSP to all new chips, security on x86 becomes nothing more than a token thing ( and as most should know from recent revelations at least, security was never a focus there anyway (never mind that numerous experts warned about it’s general crappiness over a decade ago).
“Security” in most fields of computing can in fact be complete and utter bullshit. Look at Windows AV software. You don’t need to make something secure, you just have to convince enough people that ‘retroactive security’ is viable, get them to open the wallets and bend minds accordingly…
My point is, that if you don’t like this Linux distribution or how it’s developed, then you have a choice.
I couldn’t agree more on the technical matters and I trust that he know much more than I will ever know. Cynwulf is not your average linux or non-linux user. I agree the doors exist in the chip, in the kernel, in firmware, and most importantly in the compiler. So even when you write your own simple and trustworthy code you may be compiling a binary with a built in backdoor. All “they” have to do is point to a specific connection of interest and all possible doors open, any combination that is possible, to gain full access to your machine and in a very unnoticeable way. All this live built in noise a browser creates covers up the whispers of things going in and out.
This is not what we were really talking about in that discussion and anonymity is just a tiny part of digital security but so specific that makes ALL technical analysis above irrelevant. Consider two people setting up rendezvous points and dates, utilizing some machine you bought 2nd hand, utilizing the many wifi hotspots around town, to quickly send an encrypted message to each other even using one time webmail accounts. Then destroy or allow others to take possession of that one hit machine, by casually forgetting to pick it up from a public spot. Tor can only help in a way that you probably won’t get caught red handed and identified jeopardizing also the other party. Ok, sit on a crowded but shaded by concrete place, covering up from public cameras and silently so you won’t get voice recognized by concealed microphones. Terrorists, drug dealers, intelligence officers, do things like this. Do we care? Of course not, we are law abiding citizens that mean well for all of humanity.
But what is politics and what is this recent modern youth aversion to politics? You hear it all over the place and predominantly in well to do western urban settings. The very same apolitical people would refer to office politics, workplace politics, even family politics, in a different sense. I would say politics are the human relationships formed around issues that relate to what is common. What pertains to our access to food, water, shelter, health, information and education, our access and freedom on the land we live and move around on. That is politics. To refrain from voicing an opinion or acting on those issues is the ultimate conservative and passive submissive act of accepting those in power to control and dictate everything about your life.
In this respect those who may try to terrorize or limit our access to information and the free exchange of information are a security threat, and the issue is political. It is political because the only way we can act upon a common idea about our common issues is to discuss and exchange information, opinions, arguments, amongst ourselves. In that sense digital security and anonymity are very political. It is not the individual’s issue, it is our common issue. If one of us can be scared to become silent then we all loose that one voice. Soon more voices are lost, and later there is only the voice of those who have the power to be heard and to rule without any public criticism.
So stop being silent, uninterested in “politics” and speak. I don’t care what you believe or think but it is better to express something I dislike than be scared and silent.
That is what it is about, and that is the essence of open/free software. A tool that you can control your ability to speak and be heard, to listen and to debate. This is where the issue of trust comes in. Do you trust the medium and the tool you are using to be heard? Please spare us your naive perception of already having such a freedom protected by a constitution. Wake up! Take the red pill if you must.